Why PC Polishing Is Being Replaced in Modern Fiber Optic Connectors

The PC (Physical Contact) polish was once the standard for fiber optic connectors, but modern networks demand better reflection performance. Learn why PC polishing is being phased out and how UPC and APC technologies now lead the optical connection industry.

In the evolution of fiber optic technology, connector polishing styles play a crucial role in ensuring low reflection and stable signal transmission. Among these, the PC (Physical Contact) polish was once the industry standard but has gradually given way to UPC and APC types. This article explains why PC connectors are becoming obsolete and what technologies are taking their place.

1. What Is PC Polishing?

PC, or Physical Contact polishing, refers to a connector endface that is slightly curved to ensure two fibers make physical contact, minimizing air gaps and reflection. It was developed to improve upon the older flat-polished connectors that suffered from high return loss (around –14 dB).
With PC polishing, return loss was significantly reduced to approximately –30 dB to –40 dB, which was sufficient for early multimode and short-distance single-mode applications such as early telecom systems.

Fiber Polish Type

2. Why PC Polishing Is Being Replaced

(1) Limited Optical Performance

As network speeds increased, PC’s return loss level (around –30 dB) became inadequate. In modern single-mode applications, reflected light can interfere with transmitters, causing signal instability and higher bit error rates.
By contrast, UPC (Ultra Physical Contact) offers around –50 dB, while APC (Angled Physical Contact) achieves –60 dB or better. This performance gap makes PC polishing unsuitable for today’s high-precision optical networks.

(2) Incompatibility with Modern Equipment

Most optical devices today—such as OLTs, ONUs, transceivers, and DWDM modules—are designed for UPC or APC connectors. Mixing PC connectors with newer ports can cause mismatched contact surfaces, resulting in poor alignment and higher insertion loss.
As a result, the PC interface is rarely found on new optical equipment, reducing its relevance in modern systems.

(3) Diminished Cost Advantage

Historically, PC connectors were cheaper to produce due to simpler polishing. However, with automated polishing and tighter production tolerances, the cost difference between PC and UPC/APC has become minimal. Manufacturers now prefer to standardize on UPC and APC lines to meet modern performance requirements.

(4) Industry Shift Toward Low Reflection Standards

Today’s fiber networks—from FTTH and FTTA to data centers and CATV systems—require extremely low reflectance to maintain high bandwidth and signal integrity. UPC and APC connectors, especially APC with its 8° angled endface, meet these demands by redirecting reflected light into the cladding instead of back into the core.
This trend toward high-performance, low-reflection design makes PC polishing less competitive.

3. Comparison of PC, UPC, and APC Connectors

TypeEndface GeometryTypical Return LossMain Applications
PCSlightly curved (no angle)≈ –30 to –40 dBLegacy multimode, basic telecom
UPCHighly polished curved surface≈ –50 dBFTTH, data, telecom networks
APC8° angled surface≈ –60 dB or higherFTTx, CATV, WDM, 5G systems

While PC still exists in older systems, it is now regarded as an outdated standard gradually phased out by UPC and APC due to superior reflection control and compatibility.

4. Where PC Is Still Used

PC connectors can still be found in:

  • Legacy multimode networks (OM1/OM2)

  • Low-cost, short-range links where reflection is less critical

  • Certain older telecom or industrial installations

However, as networks upgrade to higher data rates and lower tolerances, these applications continue to shrink.

Conclusion

It’s clear that PC polishing has reached the end of its lifecycle in mainstream fiber optic systems. With the rise of high-speed, low-reflection requirements, UPC and APC connectors have become the new global standards.
For modern installations, APC is preferred for precision systems like FTTx and CATV, while UPC remains the go-to for general data and telecom use. PC connectors now represent an important historical step in fiber development—but one that’s quickly being replaced by more advanced technologies.

Share this post
Browse Posts By Categories
Browse Posts By Tags
Recent Posts
Calendar
August 2026
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  
Featured Products

More Related Posts

Common Fiber Installation Mistakes

The Most Common Fiber Optic Installation Mistakes and Why They Happen

Fiber optic installation problems are often caused not by defective fiber, but by small mistakes during stripping, cleaning, routing, testing, and termination. This article examines 10 common fiber optic installation mistakes, explains why they happen, and provides practical guidance for preventing them. By following proper installation and testing procedures, technicians can improve link reliability, reduce troubleshooting time, and protect long-term network performance.

Read More »
XPO vs. CPO - Next Generation of High-Density Optical Interconnects

XPO vs. CPO: the Next Generation of High-Density Optical Interconnects

As AI workloads drive data center networks toward 800G, 1.6T, and beyond, optical interconnects must deliver higher bandwidth density while addressing power, thermal, and space constraints. This article explores the differences between XPO (eXtra-dense Pluggable Optics) and CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), examining their architectures, advantages, challenges, and potential applications in next-generation data centers. It also explains how XPO extends the pluggable optics model while CPO takes a more deeply integrated approach to optical connectivity.

Read More »
G.657.A1 vs A2_ Choosing OS2 Fiber Patch Cords

G.657.A1 vs G.657.A2: How to Choose the Right OS2 Fiber Patch Cord for FTTH

G.657.A1 and G.657.A2 OS2 fiber patch cords provide the flexibility needed for reliable FTTH installations in challenging indoor environments. This guide compares their bend performance, applications, and connector options to help you choose the right fiber patch cord for your project. Learn when to use A1 or A2 for standard, high-density, and space-constrained deployments.

Read More »